Abstract

The most commonly used oscillometric upper-arm (UA) blood pressure (BP) monitors are not convenient enough for ambulatory BP monitoring, given the large size of the arm cuff and the compression of UA during the measurement. Finger-worn oscillometric BP devices featuring miniaturized finger cuff have been developed and researched as an alternative solution to the UA-based measurement, yet the reliability of the finger-based measurement is still questioned. To investigate the feasibility of oscillometric BP measurements at the finger position, we performed model-based analysis and experimental validation to explore the underlying issues associated with extending the cuff-based oscillometric approach from UA to other alternative sites. The simulation results revealed that a larger bone-to-tissue volume ratio produced a lower pressure transmission efficiency, which can account for the inter-site measurement discrepancies of mean blood pressure (MBP). We also experimentally compared the oscillometric MBP measurements at UA, middle forearm, wrist, finger proximal phalanx, and finger distal phalanx (FD) of 20 young adults, and each position was matched with a cuff of appropriate size and kept at the same height with the heart. The experimental results demonstrated that FD could be a superior alternative position for oscillometric BP measurement, as it requires the smallest cuff size while providing the most consistent MBP with the UA. Our analysis also suggested that further study is demanded to identify the appropriate oscillometric algorithm for reliable systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure measurements at FD.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call