Abstract
Understanding physical activity is essential in the fight against child obesity. Certain accelerometers may be more useful in assessing this variable in children; easier to wear devices may facilitate better compliance and measurement over longer time periods. The objectives of this study were to a) compare children's acceptability of various accelerometers and b) compare their research utility. Children 7–10 y (n=25) were recruited within Yolo County, CA to test each of three accelerometers; the Philips Actical™ (worn on hip), the SenseWear BodyMedia™ (upper arm) and the Polar Active™ (wrist). Each week children received a device to wear over 5 continuous days. Parents were asked to note device removals. After each use, children and parent each completed a structured interview with trained staff. Upon completion, children were asked to place the devices in order from most to least preferred. The Polar Active was most accepted by children and useful to researchers in providing data on activity intensity levels. This device also engaged children with real time feedback on activity achievements. These findings will aid researchers in choosing measurement tools for children's physical activity.Grant Funding Source : Foods for Health Institute
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.