Feasibility, correlates, and validity of the one-leg sit-to-stand test in individuals following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Abstract

ObjectiveRegular quadriceps strength assessment is important following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The one-leg sit-to-stand (OLSTS) test potentially overcomes the barrier of accessibility to specialised testing equipment. However, feasibility and validity testing of OLSTS is lacking in the ACLR population. This study aims to examine the feasibility, correlates, and predictive validity of OLSTS with self-reported running and jumping difficulty in individuals post-ACLR. DesignRetrospective longitudinal study. Methods20 patients with primary unilateral ACLR were tested at 6-months and 1-year post-ACLR. Feasibility was assessed by the number of patients who had safely performed OLSTS at both timepoints. Cross-sectional gender-adjusted Spearman correlations of OLSTS with quadriceps strength, physical impairments, and psychological variables were measured at 6-months. Predictive validity was assessed via ordinal regression, quantifying the associations of OLSTS with self-reported running and jumping difficulty across time-points. ResultsAll patients understood the instructions to and were able to self-administer the OLSTS test safely. OLSTS is a valid measure of quadriceps strength (gender-adjusted Spearman's ρ = 0.53, P = 0.02). Knee pain (ρ = 0.44, P = 0.046) and readiness to return-to-sport (ρ = 0.55, P = 0.02) were additional correlates. Greater OLSTS performance was associated with greater odds of better self-reported running and jumping function (interquartile-range ORs, 12.0 [95% CI: 3.6–45] and 18.5 [95% CI: 5–67], respectively). ConclusionOLSTS is a feasible and valid test of quadriceps strength, demonstrating predictive validity with self-reported running and jumping post-ACLR. OLSTS potentially allows independent tracking of ACLR rehabilitation progress at home – an increasingly urgent necessity in the face of a global pandemic.