Abstract

Acid gas injection operations function as the commercial equivalent of certain aspects within the realm of geological CO2 storage. Acid gas, composed of H2S and CO2, alongside minor quantities of hydrocarbon gases stemming from either petroleum production or processing, constitute the composition of acid gas. The primary aim of acid gas injection operations lies in the disposal of H2S. Nevertheless, substantial volumes of CO2 are concurrently injected due to the economic impracticality of segregating the two gases. This investigation delves into the comprehensive, step-by-step procedure that can be employed to determine the suitability of a field or formation for acid gas injection, utilizing all accessible data, including the literature and data from neighboring fields. This approach incorporates sensitivity analysis of various parameters to ascertain the feasibility of AGI while minimizing costs and time consumption. The focus of this study centers on evaluating the feasibility of Acid Gas Injection (AGI) in a saline aquifer offshore in Iran. The assessment encompasses the examination of reservoir properties, geomechanical aspects, caprock integrity, and gas plume dynamics. The Surmeh formation emerges as a promising candidate for AGI due to the presence of upper dolomite and lower carbonate within the rock formations. Geomechanical analysis reveals a pore pressure of 3800 psi and a fracture pressure of 6100 psi. Caprock integrity, particularly within the Hith formation, emerges as pivotal for both containment and long-term stability. Seismic mapping highlights variations in caprock thickness, influencing containment effectiveness. Capillary trapping emerges as a significant factor in short-term gas entrapment and plume distribution. Numerical simulations elucidate the impact of heterogeneous rock properties on capillary trapping and gas plume movement. The projection estimates approximately 2 TCF (Trillion Cubic Feet) of acid gas injection into the Surmeh formation. Based on the acid gas content and the gas in place at the source of injection, the recommended injection rate stands at 180 MMSCFD (million standard cubic feet per day). The formation’s inherent tightness limits injectivity, allowing for a maximum achievable rate of 7 MMSCFD with a permeability of 1 mD (millidarcy). However, a higher porosity (12%) and a permeability of 100 mD enable more efficient injection without fracturing the formation. To achieve this, it becomes imperative to implement two injection wells, each with a capacity of 90 MMSCFD.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call