Feasibility and safety of cavotricuspid isthmus ablation using exclusive intracardiac echocardiography guidance: a proof-of-concept, observational trial

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Catheter ablation is the preferred treatment for typical atrial flutter (AFl), although it can pose challenges due to anatomical abnormalities. The integration of 3D electroanatomical mapping systems (EAMS) has notably diminished the need for fluoroscopy in AFl ablation procedures. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) has also demonstrated advantages in reducing radiation exposure during AFl ablation. Nevertheless, there is a lack of evidence on the feasibility of ICE-guided, zero-fluoroscopy AFl ablation without the use of EAMS. Methods In this prospective study, we enrolled 80 patients with CTI-dependent AFl. The initial 40 patients underwent ablation guided by standard fluoroscopy along with ICE (Standard ICE group), whereas the remaining 40 patients underwent zero-fluoroscopy ablation exclusively using ICE (Zero ICE group). Procedure outcomes, including acute success, procedural duration, fluoroscopy duration, radiation dose, and any associated complications, were compared between the groups. Results Both groups achieved a 100% acute success rate. In the Zero ICE group, the zero-fluoroscopy approach was successfully executed in 39 out of 40 cases (97.5%). There were no significant differences in procedure time (55.5 (46.5; 66.8) min vs. 51.5 (44.0; 65.5), p=0.50) and puncture to first ablation time (18 (13.5; 23) min vs. 19 (15; 23.5) min, p=0.50) between the groups. The Zero ICE group had significantly lower fluoroscopy time (57 (36.3; 90) sec vs. 0 (0; 0) sec, p<0.001) and dose (3.17 (2.27; 5.63) mGy vs. 0 (0; 0) mGy, p<0.001 compared to the Standard ICE group. Total ablation time was longer in the Standard ICE group (597 (447; 908) sec vs. 430 (260; 750), p=0.02), but total ablation energy (22458 (14836; 31116) Ws vs. 17043 (10533; 29302) Ws, p=0.10) did not differ significantly. First-pass bidirectional conduction block of the CTI and acute reconnection rates were comparable between the groups. No complications or recurrences were noted during the follow-up period. Conclusion ICE-guided, zero-fluoroscopy CTI ablation for AFl using only ICE is feasible and safe. This method effectively eliminates radiation exposure without compromising procedural duration, total ablation time, or acute success rates.isthmus ablation by ICE