Abstract

Background: Our hospital is situated in rural Japan. Remote monitoring systems for cardiac-implanted devices, such as implantable pacer-generators (IPG) or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD), are usable in areas hardly accessible by means of public transportation. However, the systems are not readily operable by elderly patients.Objective: Clarification on the feasibility of using the system, and problems on the remote monitoring system.Method: Form April 2010 to May 2011, we introduced remote monitoring systems for 26 patients (mean age: 71.3±10.6; %male 84%). We retrospectively studied the patients, background, the frequency of transmission, and the data transmitted. And we compared the frequency of transmission by the elderly group (age >=75) with the younger group.Results: The implanted devices were ICD for 20 cases (16 cases, with Optivol system) and IPG for 6 cases (3 cases, with ATP system). Frequency of transmission: 95 (total), 3.8±3.2 (mean and SD), 89 (planned), 11 (unplanned), respectively. In the elderly group, the frequency of transmission: 2.1±1.7, which was smaller than in the younger group (4.9±3.5, p<0.05). Transmitted data (planned): No event 50, AT/AF 26, SVT/NST 6, VT/VF (no Tx) 6, Optivol 11, (unplanned): VT/VF (with Tx) 5, SVT 1, Optivol+AT 4.Conclusion: For elderly patients, the use of remote monitoring systems is feasible to promptly detect the device status but the difficulty of data transmission remains intact.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call