Abstract

BackgroundRefugees in sub-Saharan Africa face both the risk of HIV infection and barriers to HIV testing. We conducted a pilot study to determine the feasibility and acceptability of home-based HIV testing in Nakivale Refugee Settlement in Uganda and to compare home-based and clinic-based testing participants in Nakivale.MethodsFrom February–March 2014, we visited homes in 3 villages in Nakivale up to 3 times and offered HIV testing. We enrolled adults who spoke English, Kiswahili, Kinyarwanda, or Runyankore; some were refugees and some Ugandan nationals. We surveyed them about their socio-demographic characteristics. We evaluated the proportion of individuals encountered (feasibility) and assessed participation in HIV testing among those encountered (acceptability). We compared characteristics of home-based and clinic-based testers (from a prior study in Nakivale) using Wilcoxon rank sum and Pearson’s chi-square tests. We examined the relationship between a limited number of factors (time of visit, sex, and number of individuals at home) on willingness to test, using logistic regression models with the generalized estimating equations approach to account for clustering.ResultsOf 566 adults living in 319 homes, we encountered 507 (feasibility = 90%): 353 (62%) were present at visit one, 127 (22%) additional people at visit two, and 27 (5%) additional people at visit three. Home-based HIV testing participants totaled 378 (acceptability = 75%). Compared to clinic-based testers, home-based testers were older (median age 30 [IQR 24–40] vs 28 [IQR 22–37], p < 0.001), more likely refugee than Ugandan national (93% vs 79%, < 0.001), and more likely to live ≥1 h from clinic (74% vs 52%, < 0.001). The HIV prevalence was lower, but not significantly, in home-based compared to clinic-based testing participants (1.9 vs 3.4% respectively, p = 0.27). Testing was not associated with time of visit (p = 0.50) or sex (p = 0.66), but for each additional person at home, the odds of accepting HIV testing increased by over 50% (OR 1.52, 95%CI 1.12–2.06, p = 0.007).ConclusionsHome-based HIV testing in Nakivale Refugee Settlement was feasible, with 90% of eligible individuals encountered within 3 visits, and acceptable with 75% willing to test for HIV, with a yield of nearly 2% individuals tested identified as HIV-positive.

Highlights

  • Refugees in sub-Saharan Africa face both the risk of the virus that causes AIDS? [Yes] (HIV) infection and barriers to HIV testing

  • To assess the acceptability of home-based HIV testing in the refugee settlement, we evaluated the proportion of eligible individuals at home who participated in home-based HIV testing

  • 378 (75%) of the 507 encountered individuals participated in home-based HIV testing and received their test results

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Refugees in sub-Saharan Africa face both the risk of HIV infection and barriers to HIV testing. 3.5 million of whom live in Sub-Saharan Africa, are susceptible to contracting HIV because of threats of sexual violence, and increased vulnerability due to stress and inadequate nutrition [2,3,4,5]. Strategies that increase the ease of accessing HIV testing for those living in refugee settlements will likely result in decreased morbidity, mortality and transmission of disease. Home-based HIV testing has been effective in many resource limited settings in sub-Saharan Africa [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20], but may not be a successful testing strategy in a refugee settlement. With numerous livelihood challenges in refugee settlements [6, 26,27,28], it is possible that refugees are not encountered at home as they may be away seeking employment or cultivating their land to grow food

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call