Abstract
BackgroundExercise interventions are typically delivered to people with cancer and survivors via supervised clinical rehabilitation. However, motivating and maintaining activity changes outside of the clinic setting remains challenging. This study investigated the feasibility, acceptability and efficacy of an individually-tailored, text message-enhanced intervention that focused on increasing whole-of-day activity both during and beyond a 4-week, supervised clinical exercise rehabilitation program for people with cancer and survivors.MethodsParticipants (n = 36; mean ± SD age 64.8 ± 9.6 years; 44.1 ± 30.8 months since treatment) were randomized 1:1 to receive the text message-enhanced clinical exercise rehabilitation program, or the standard clinical exercise rehabilitation program alone. Activity was assessed at baseline, 4-weeks (end of the standard program) and 12-weeks (end of enhanced program) using both device (activPAL accelerometer; sitting, standing, light-stepping, moderate-stepping) and self-report [Multimedia Activity Recall for Children and Adults (MARCA); sedentary, light, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA)] methods. The MARCA also assessed time use domains to provide context to activity changes. Changes and intervention effects were evaluated using linear mixed models, adjusting for baseline values and potential confounders.ResultsThe study had high retention (86%) and participants reported high levels of satisfaction [4.3/5 (±0.8)] with the intervention. Over the first 4 weeks, MARCA-assessed MVPA increased [+ 53.2 (95%CI: 2.9, 103.5) min/d] between groups, favoring the text message-enhanced program, but there were no significant intervention effects on sedentary behavior. By 12 weeks, relative to the standard group, participants in the text message-enhanced group sat less [activPAL overall sitting: − 48.2 (− 89.9, − 5.6) min/16 h awake; MARCA: -80.1 (− 156.5, − 3.8) min/d] and were participating in more physical activity [activPAL light stepping: + 7.0 (0.4, 13.6: min/16 h awake; MARCA MVPA: + 67.3 (24.0, 110.6) min/d]. The time-use domains of Quiet Time [− 63.3 (− 110.5, − 16.0) min/d] and Screen Time [− 62.0 (− 109.7, − 14.2) min/d] differed significantly between groups.ConclusionsResults demonstrate feasibility, acceptability and efficacy of a novel, text message-enhanced clinical exercise rehabilitation program to support changes in whole-of-day activity, including both physical activity and sedentary behavior. Changes were largely seen at 12-week follow-up, indicating potential for the intervention to result in continued improvement and maintenance of behavior change following a supervised exercise intervention.Trial registrationThis trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12616000641493; date registered 17/5/16).
Highlights
Exercise interventions are typically delivered to people with cancer and survivors via supervised clinical rehabilitation
Changes were largely seen at 12-week follow-up, indicating potential for the intervention to result in continued improvement and maintenance of behavior change following a supervised exercise intervention
There is considerable evidence that the distribution of time spent between these non-moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) activities has a significant impact on health, with time accrued in prolonged, unbroken bouts of sitting potentially harmful [14,15,16,17]
Summary
Exercise interventions are typically delivered to people with cancer and survivors via supervised clinical rehabilitation. There is considerable evidence that the distribution of time spent between these non-MVPA activities has a significant impact on health, with time accrued in prolonged, unbroken bouts of sitting potentially harmful (e.g. poor cardiometabolic health markers and musculoskeletal fatigue and pain) [14,15,16,17] Evidence to this effect has prompted the inclusion of recommendations for sedentary behavior in physical activity guidelines [18]. The emphasis has moved away from just increasing time in MVPA to reallocating time away from sedentary to non-sedentary activities (including light and MVPA intensities) This whole-of-day approach is yet to be applied in an exercise rehabilitation setting, or to people with cancer or survivors. Their high levels of sedentary time compared to their non-cancer survivor counterparts [21], and increased risk of comorbid chronic disease [22] mean people with cancer and survivors are likely to benefit from this whole-of-day approach
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
