Abstract
Today, many women work in occupational roles that had once been dominated by men (e.g., senior business executives). However, expectations on senior executives to be agentic (e.g., assertive, dominant) may conflict with prescriptive stereotypes about women to be communal (e.g., helpful, warm). According to this double-bind dilemma, female senior executives get criticized for lacking either agency or communion as both dimensions can be perceived as posing a tradeoff. We hypothesize that female senior executives report higher levels of agency and lower levels of communion than women in a more neutral role (e.g., lecturers) due to the perceived requirements of these occupational roles. In Study 1, N = 212 students rated adjectives on their desirability for men vs. women in Chinese society. They rated agentic characteristics as more desirable for men and communal characteristics as more desirable for women. Studies 2 and 3 used this material. Study 2 randomly assigned N = 207 female students to the role of a senior executive vs. lecturer. Study 3 was conducted with N = 202 female role occupants (96 senior executives, 106 lecturers). As expected, female senior executives reported higher levels of agency and lower levels of communion than female lecturers in both studies. Some women may be particularly aware of the above-mentioned double-bind dilemma and may be more worried about the potential backlash than others. They may attempt to reconcile occupational demands (i.e., higher agency, lower communion) with prescriptive gender stereotypes (i.e., lower agency, higher communion). We, therefore, explored whether fear of backlash attenuates the effect of the type of role of women (senior executives vs. lecturers) on agency and communion. Indeed, we found that senior executives who were particularly worried about backlash reported almost as much communion as lecturers did. In contrast, senior executives consistently reported higher levels of agency than lecturers regardless of their fear of backlash. The present study documents prescriptive gender stereotypes in China, how women differ as a function of their occupational roles, and how fear of backlash may motivate female senior executives to reconcile having high levels of both agency and communion.
Highlights
Agency-Communion Tensions and the Double-Bind Dilemma of Women in the Workplace suffer a backlash, such as being perceived as less likable, less hireable, or less promotable, as well as other social and economic penalties (Rudman, 1998; Moss-Racusin and Rudman, 2010; Rudman et al, 2012a; Williams and Tiedens, 2016; Schaumberg and Flynn, 2017; Hentschel et al, 2018).“Women who attempt to fit themselves into a managerial role by acting like men are forced to behave in a sexually dissonant way
We explored whether the positive relationship between the role type of women and the agency is attenuated by fear of backlash (Research question 1) and whether the negative relationship between role type of women and communion is attenuated by fear of backlash (Research question 2)
In Study 2, participants are imagining themselves in the role and assessing their self-reported agency, self-reported communion, and the fear of backlash at work under the imagination research paradigm
Summary
“Women who attempt to fit themselves into a managerial role by acting like men are forced to behave in a sexually dissonant way. They risk being characterized as ‘too aggressive.’. Traditional gender roles still exist in China, there are more and more women who break the glass ceiling and occupy the senior executive role. According to a 2016 international business report, 30% of senior business executives in China were women (Brosnan, 2016). The double-bind dilemma is a dilemma that women in counterstereotypical roles, especially in a managerial role, hardly meet competing demands, and they are usually perceived as either agentic or communal, but rarely both (Eagly and Carli, 2007)
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.