Abstract
There is a growing literature on the large-scale multiple testing in which the Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) procedure and its variants play a key role. Almost all this work assumes that the underlying distribution is normal in calculating the p-values. Here we study the effect of non-normality on false discovery control in large-scale multiple testing. The normal approximation, bootstrap calibration and the skewness-corrected normal approximation methods of approximating the individual p-values used to rank the significance levels are investigated. As an illustration, we compare these procedures with the BH method in terms of the cutting threshold and the false discovery rate.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.