Abstract

A patient’s response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is a complex quantitative trait, and determined by multiple intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Three currently FDA-approved predictive biomarkers (progra1mmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1); microsatellite instability (MSI); tumor mutational burden (TMB)) are routinely used for patient selection for ICI response in clinical practice. Although clinical utility of these biomarkers has been demonstrated in ample clinical trials, many variables involved in using these biomarkers have poised serious challenges in daily practice. Furthermore, the predicted responders by these three biomarkers only have a small percentage of overlap, suggesting that each biomarker captures different contributing factors to ICI response. Optimized use of currently FDA-approved biomarkers and development of a new generation of predictive biomarkers are urgently needed. In this review, we will first discuss three widely used FDA-approved predictive biomarkers and their optimal use. Secondly, we will review four novel gene signature biomarkers: T-cell inflamed gene expression profile (GEP), T-cell dysfunction and exclusion gene signature (TIDE), melanocytic plasticity signature (MPS) and B-cell focused gene signature. The GEP and TIDE have shown better predictive performance than PD-L1, and PD-L1 or TMB, respectively. The MPS is superior to PD-L1, TMB, and TIDE. The B-cell focused gene signature represents a previously unexplored predictive biomarker to ICI response. Thirdly, we will highlight two combined predictive biomarkers: TMB+GEP and MPS+TIDE. These integrated biomarkers showed improved predictive outcomes compared to a single predictor. Finally, we will present a potential nucleic acid biomarker signature, allowing DNA and RNA biomarkers to be analyzed in one assay. This comprehensive signature could represent a future direction of developing robust predictive biomarkers, particularly for the cold tumors, for ICI response.

Highlights

  • Immunotherapy has changed the treatment landscape of many different cancer types in recent years

  • As opposed to programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and microsatellite instability (MSI) testing, which are primarily suitable for metastatic colorectal cancer and other cancers belonging to the spectrum of Lynch syndrome, NGS method can be used for all tumor types, including nonLynch syndrome rare cancers for multiple immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)

  • The panel should be sufficiently large, including ≥300 targeted genes. These genes should be carefully selected by including the following: (i) other tumor mutational burden (TMB)-related marker genes, such as POLE whose mutations are associated with TMB-H in multiple solid tumor types like endometrial, CRC, gastric, melanoma, lung, and pediatric cancers [60,61,62], or BRAF and MET whose alterations are associated with longer duration of ICI treatment; (ii) other immunotherapy response-related genes, such as genes for MSI estimate, immune resistant gene, IDO1, and JAK [4, 5]; (iii) multiple types of alterations, such as mutations, indels, amplifications, CNAs, and structure variations

Read more

Summary

Frontiers in Oncology

Three currently FDA-approved predictive biomarkers (progra1mmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1); microsatellite instability (MSI); tumor mutational burden (TMB)) are routinely used for patient selection for ICI response in clinical practice. The B-cell focused gene signature represents a previously unexplored predictive biomarker to ICI response. We will highlight two combined predictive biomarkers: TMB+GEP and MPS+TIDE. These integrated biomarkers showed improved predictive outcomes compared to a single predictor. Predictive Biomarkers for ICI nucleic acid biomarker signature, allowing DNA and RNA biomarkers to be analyzed in one assay. This comprehensive signature could represent a future direction of developing robust predictive biomarkers, for the cold tumors, for ICI response

INTRODUCTION
THREE FDA APPROVED PREDICTIVE BIOMARKERS
Scoring System
Nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab Durvalumab
IHC for dMMR
Promising Mutation Predictive Biomarkers
Gene Signature Predictive Biomarkers
Combinational Predictive Biomarkers
FUTURE DIRECTION OF PREDICTIVE BIOMARKER DISCOVERY
Findings
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call