Abstract
This retrospective study assessed long-term clinical outcome in a series of patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy (ACD) for treatment of myeloradiculopathy secondary to one- to two-level cervical discoarthrosis. To verify concerns about long-term adverse clinical effects following ACD, a review of literature on the topic was also made. The clinical course and long-term outcome of 125 consecutive patients with cervical myeloradiculopathy operated on by ACD 5 to 19 years ago (mean, 11.3 years) were reviewed. Seventy-four patients (59%) showed a clinical picture of pure radiculopathy, and 51 patients (41%) had myeloradiculopathy. Long-term clinical outcome and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores for neck and arm pain were recently assessed and compared with post-surgical status. Clinical outcome was graded according to the criteria of Odom et al. (JAMA 166:23-28, 36). The survey of the literature on long-term clinical outcome after ACD was internet-based. Long-term clinical outcome was excellent in 61% of patients, good in 26%, satisfactory in 9% and poor in 4%. The same figures at the time of discharge were 65%, 29%, 6% and 0%, respectively. Mean long-term neck and arm pain VAS scores were 2.5 and 0.8, respectively, while postoperatively, the same values were 2.1 and 0.5. Additional discectomy at an adjacent level was performed in five patients 10 months to 8 years after the first operation. In our series, 96% of patients had a sustained favourable long-term clinical outcome after ACD. These favourable results confirm data in the literature and support our preference for ACD as the simplest, fastest and cheapest surgical option for treating myeloradiculopathy secondary to one- to two-level cervical discoarthrosis.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.