Abstract
Hydrophobic amino acids of the group Leu, Ile, Val, Phe, and Met (LIVFM) are distributed in favored or suppressed patterns within protein sequences. The frequencies of all five-position combinations of [symbol: see text] = LIVFM and [symbol: see text] = non-LIVFM residues were analyzed in 48 proteins of known crystallographic structure. Some motifs were strongly preferred or suppressed; e.g., [symbol: see text] was favored (z = 3.5), while [symbol: see text] was suppressed (z = -3.4). In longer patterns, [symbol: see text] followed by [symbol: see text] and one [symbol: see text] was favored ([symbol: see text], z = 5.1), while conversion of the single hydrophobic residue to a pair was not ([symbol: see text], z = 0.8). Distributions of certain non-LIVFM amino acids around [symbol: see text] positions in strongly favored patterns were also favored or disfavored (Asp, Glu, Lys, Arg, Asn, Cys, Tyr, and Pro; for each magnitude of z > 2.0). While the strongly favored pattern [symbol: see text] was found in both alpha-helical and beta-strand sequences, it associated significantly with alpha-helices (z = 3.6 for the second-position alpha-helical phi and psi angles) but not with beta-strands (z = -1.1). Certain motifs of LIVFM and non-LIVFM residues might be selected if they lead efficiently to the local nucleations hypothesized to characterize molten globule intermediates in the folding of proteins.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.