Abstract
We have previously demonstrated that prolonged use of glaucoma medications was associated with a poor surgical outcome of ab interno trabeculotomy (µTLO). Given that almost all types of glaucoma eye drop either enhance the drainage through the uveoscleral pathway or reduce aqueous humor production, we hypothesized that prolonged use of these medications might cause disuse atrophy of the conventional pathway. In contrast, ripasudil increases the conventional outflow and eventually shows a favorable outcome of µTLO. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of ripasudil use on µTLO outcomes. The medical charts of 218 patients who underwent µTLO were analyzed retrospectively. We compared the 1-year outcome between ripasudil users versus nonusers by using propensity score matching. We set the covariates as age, sex, glaucoma types, preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), the mean deviation values of visual field tests, the presence or absence of concomitant cataract surgery, trabecular meshwork incision range, the presence or absence of any glaucoma medication except ripasudil and duration of glaucoma medical therapy. Success was defined as a postoperative IOP between 5 and 21mmHg, a ≥ 20% IOP reduction from baseline, and no additional glaucoma surgery at postoperative 1year. Fifty-seven patients each were allocated to the ripasudil users or nonusers. The 1-year success rates were 74% in ripasudil users and 51% in nonusers (p = 0.01). Kaplan‒Meier survival curves also showed that the ripasudil users had a higher survival distribution (p = 0.01). The patients who took ripasudil showed a favorable 1-year outcome of µTLO.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.