Abstract
In the context of modeling and reasoning about agent actions, contingent and classical planning can often be respectively seen as adopting ``extreme pessimism'' and ``extreme optimism'' about the action outcomes. For many everyday scenarios of human reasoning (and thus for many types of autonomous systems), both these approaches are just too extreme. Following Jensen, Veloso, and Bryant (2004), we examine a planning model that interpolates between classical and contingent planning via tolerance to arbitrary k faults occurring during plan execution. We show that an important fragment of this fault tolerant planning (FT-planning) exhibits both an appealing solution structure, as well as appealing worst-case time-complexity properties. We also show that such FT-planning tasks can be efficiently compiled into classical planning as long as the number of possible faults per operator is bounded by a constant, and we show that this compilation can be attractive in practice.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.