Abstract

Biofilm fouling is known to impact the data quality of sensors, but little is known about the exact effects. We studied the effects of artificial and real biofilm fouling on dissolved oxygen (DO) sensors in full-scale water resource recovery facilities, and how this can automatically be detected. Biofilm fouling resulted in different drift direction and bias magnitudes for optical (OPT) and electrochemical (MEC) DO sensors. The OPT-sensor was more affected by biofilm fouling compared to the MEC-sensor, especially during summer conditions. A bias of 1 mg/L was detected by analysing the impulse response (IR) of the automatic air cleaning system in the DO sensor. The IR is an effect of a temporal increase in DO concentration during the automatic air cleaning. The IRs received distinct pattern changes that were matched with faults including: biofilm fouling, disturbances in the air supply to the cleaning system, and damaged sensor membrane, which can be used for fault diagnosis. The results highlight the importance of a condition-based sensor maintenance schedule in contrast to fixed cleaning intervals. Further, the results stress the importance of understanding and detecting bias due to biofilm fouling, in order to maintain a robust and resource-efficient process control.

Highlights

  • The dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration is a key measured variable in water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs)

  • The results have improved our knowledge of how biofilm fouling impacts the data quality of DO sensors

  • The bias progression speed due to biofilm fouling differed between sensor types, which needs to be considered in fall-back strategies for process control

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration is a key measured variable in water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs). Two measurement technologies are common, membrane electrochemical (MEC) and optical fluorescent (OPT) measurement techniques. The MEC type was originally described in Clark ( ) and the OPT type was introduced by Demas et al ( ). The DO concentration is maintained at different DO set-points at different zones using multiple DO sensors to enhance biological nitrogen removal. Multiple parallel treatment lines result in a large total number of installed DO sensors.

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.