Abstract

Industry 4.0 and Cyber Physical Production Systems (CPPS) are often discussed and partially already sold. One important feature of CPPS is fault tolerance and as a consequence self-configuration and restart to increase Overall Equipment Effectiveness. To understand this challenge at first the state of the art of fault handling in industrial automated production systems (aPS) is discussed as a result of a case study analysis in eight companies developing aPS. In the next step, metrics to evaluate the concept of self-configuration and restart for aPS focusing on real-time capabilities, fault coverage and effort to increase fault coverage are proposed. Finally, two different lab size case studies prove the applicability of the concepts of self-configuration, restart and the proposed metrics.

Highlights

  • In the course of Industry 4.0, intelligent products and production units are implemented

  • In industrial practice in machine and plant engineering, initially the general software architecture and especially handling of faults was analyzed in order to examine how reconfiguration and recovery in case of faults is already or will be implemented in future and which challenges thereby arise and how to evaluate different strategies with metrics

  • Figure 1) and, exemplary, the fault handling mechanisms were assigned to these five levels in order to analyze differences and similarities regarding fault handling and its integration into the software architecture

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the course of Industry 4.0, intelligent products and production units are implemented. To elaborate the challenge to realize such concepts in real world industrial applications, the state of the art in fault handling and software architecture as a basis for adaptivity after a fault is given, derived from eight industrial case studies Despite the lack in realization in industrial aPS up to now, adaptivity concepts have been developed in academia and implemented in lab-size demonstrators for Industry 4.0, e.g. myJoghurt.

State of the Art—Challenges and Weaknesses
Metrics for Adaptive aPS
D2 D3 D4
Proposed Metrics for Adaptivity Focusing on Fault Handling
Real-Time Capability
Minimal Programming Effort to Increase Fault Coverage
Minimal Modeling Effort to Increase Fault Coverage
Metrics for Fault Coverage
Restart of PPU after Emergency Shut-Down
Results of the Evaluation
Section 5.1 PPU sorting FCA based fault detection and self-compensation

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.