Fatigue wear test comparing vitamin-E-blended crosslinked polyethylene and conventional polyethylene in a Posterior Dynamic Stabilization System of the spine in the laboratory

Abstract

BackgroundAlthough artificial joints using polyethylene have been developed for various joints, the development of Posterior Dynamic Stabilization system of the spine using polyethylene has proceeded at a much slower pace. There are no studies which compare the abrasion resistance of vitamin-E-blended crosslinked polyethylene (VE) and conventional polyethylene (Virgin) in the spinal region. The purpose of this study was to compare the wear resistance of VE and Virgin in a Posterior Dynamic Stabilization System of the spine. MethodsPosterior Dynamic Stabilization System of the spine uses a polyethylene ball as a sliding surface. A fatigue wear test was repeated up to 1 million cycles at a speed of ±5°, 1 Hz while the rod was being pulled at a load of 50 N. Balls were compared using VE and Virgin in 6 samples each. Ti-6AL-4 V (Ti 64) and Co–Cr–Mo (CoCr) rods were used. Abrasion loss and shape change of the polyethylene balls were compared. ResultsWhen Ti 64 was used as the rod, the average wear amount was −0.01 mg (0.02 mg, 0.01 mg, −0.06 mg) for VE, and 0.23 mg (0.18 mg, 0.13 mg, 0.38 mg) for Virgin. When CoCr was used as the rod, the average wear amount was 0.42 mg (0.71 mg, −0.06 mg, 0.61 mg) for VE, and 0.73 mg (0.72 mg, 0.70 mg, 0.76 mg) for Virgin. Most polyethylene samples showed indentations of 0.1 m or less at the contact point with the set screw. In the combination of Virgin and CoCr, a white patch was observed on the inner side of the polyethylene samples, with a maximum depression of 0.1 mm. ConclusionsA fatigue wear test showed VE to be more efficient in abrasion resistance than Virgin in a Posterior Dynamic Stabilization System of the spine in the laboratory.