Abstract
• A test method for tensile fatigue of bare GFRP bars is proposed. • Stresses of GFRP-reinforced concrete bridge decks under service loads are provided. • Results of a bare GFRP bar subjected to 5-million cycle fatigue test are provided. Glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars are a valid alternative to traditional steel bars for reinforcing concrete structures in specific situations. Although the elastic modulus of GFRP bars is generally 20–25% of that of steel bars, which entails for a higher cross-sectional area of GFRP than of steel bars for the same axial stiffness, they have superior durability with respect to the steel counterpart, which makes them suitable for applications in aggressive environments, such as those exposed to the chloride attack. Among these, RC bridge decks represent a typical case where GFRP bars strongly increases the structure durability, since they do not suffer for the chloride attack caused by the use of deicing agents. Bridge decks are subjected to cyclic loads that may induce fatigue issues. However, quite limited studies are available in the literature regarding the fatigue behavior of GFRP bars. In this paper, the test method for tensile fatigue provided by the European standard ISO 10406–1 is discussed and modified to account for the actual cyclic stresses applied to representative RC members subjected to fatigue, namely bridge decks. The results of a tensile test of a GFRP bar according to the modified procedure are then presented and discussed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.