Abstract

In order for additive manufacturing to become a viable manufacturing method for aerospace engineering, it is required that exhaustive static and fatigue testing be performed. The testing is required in order to describe material properties in a statistical manner. Fatigue tests were performed on standard additive manufactured ASTM E466 test specimens in order to obtain the low (1000 cycles) to high cycle (1E6 cycles) behaviour of AlSi10Mg. The specimens were manufactured using non-heat treated, but stress relieved specimens. Specimens were printed in three build directions, namely the XY (parallel with build plate), 45 degree and vertical direction as measured with respect to the build baseplate. The three different directions were chosen to investigate the sensitivity of the material properties to the build direction. The specimens were stress relieved on the baseplate. Static testing was also performed on specimens according to ASTM E8/E8M. The specimens were produced to have a surface finish representative of standard deburring techniques used in the aerospace industry. The surface roughness on the specimens were measured. The scatter in test data as a result of the surface finish on material properties is quantified. It is a requirement to quantify the effect of the surface roughness on fatigue failure allowable values since a machined type finish (less than 3.2 micrometer) is not always practically possible to achieve with additive manufactured structures. This is because the organic shapes produced with additive manufacturing makes some surfaces inaccessible to normal surface finishing techniques. Furthermore, some internal structures such as lattice structures are completely inaccessible to surface finishing techniques such as polishing or lapping. In addition to the surface roughness the roundness of the test section was also measured using inspection equipment. This was required since the industrial deburring techniques did not yield a completely concentric test section as a lathe operation would produce. Once again this is representative of an additive manufactured structure. The fatigue tests were performed at an R-ratio of 0.1. The test results were used to produce Wöhler or S-N curves for the material in all three material directions. The scatter was quantified using industry accepted methods. The results were compared with fatigue test results from literature of specimens produced with a lathe in order to compare a practical industrial surface finish on an additive manufactured component with a machined surface finish. It was found that the build support structures of the additive manufacturing process causes stress concentrations in the fatigue test specimens. This leads to a reduction in fatigue life and an increase in the scatter of the results.

Highlights

  • For metal additive manufacturing to become a viable manufacturing method for aerospace engineering, it is required that exhaustive static and fatigue testing be performed

  • Denel Aeronautics is involved in mostly aluminium manufacturing and it made logical sense to focus efforts towards developing additive manufacturing on aluminium

  • The specimen was stress relieved following the Finite element analysis showed that the eccentricity of the additive manufacturing process, but no further heat treatment test section would introduce bending

Read more

Summary

Introduction

For metal additive manufacturing to become a viable manufacturing method for aerospace engineering, it is required that exhaustive static and fatigue testing be performed. It was decided to develop a test program based on the research was to apply testing on the as-printed test specimens, where the support structures of the test specimens were removed with industrial techniques. A further objective of this study was to define some statistical measures with which to knock down the mean fatigue properties This kind of knockdown factor is important in order to achieve the 10-6 probability of failure that aircraft material specimens need to achieve. It is common to have inaccessible surface areas on components since additive manufacturing can be used to manufacture complex shapes

Test Specimen Details
Surface Finish
Static Test Set-up and Results
Fatigue Test Set-up and Results
Wöhler Curve Assumptions
Comparison to Existing Research
Quantification of Scatter
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call