Fatigue in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Survivors: Correlates, Care Team Communication, and Patient-Identified Mitigation Strategies

Abstract

With improved survival after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), the number of individuals at risk for persistent or late effects is increasing. The importance of optimizing HCT survivor health and well-being is mounting. Fatigue is a common post-transplantation symptom that impairs quality of life, yet it remains poorly understood and inadequately addressed. Multiple challenges to addressing fatigue exist, including its multidimensional presentation, multiple (often concomitant) causes, patient-clinician communication barriers, and few highly effective, evidence-based interventions that can be readily implemented. To address these challenges, we sought to better describe the impact and potential causes of fatigue in the post-transplantation setting, fatigue-related communication with clinicians, and the most effective patient-identified mitigation strategies (PIMS) for fatigue. A total of 1703 adult HCT recipients from a single center completed a survey including the Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-36 (SF-36), PROMIS Fatigue, and other fatigue-related items between July 2017-June 2018. The survey was offered to recipients at their post-transplantation anniversary occurring during this interval. Two independent raters categorized free-text responses about fatigue PIMS. PROMIS Fatigue scores were dichotomized into low (≤55) or high (>55). Associations between high fatigue and participant characteristics and health outcomes were evaluated using the Fisher exact test for categorical variables and the Student 2-sample t test for continuous variables. Among the 1660 respondents with evaluable fatigue scores, 67% underwent allogeneic HCT. The majority of these (n=1588; 96%) had a malignancy, with hematologic malignancy the most common diagnostic category (n=1555; 94%). The median time post-transplantation was 11 years (interquartile range, 4 to 20 years). PROMIS item responses indicate that 44% of patients were at least somewhat fatigued and 37% were at least somewhat bothered by it. The mean fatigue score was 50.2 ± 11; 591 patients (36%) had high fatigue, which was associated with worse SF-36 scores across all domains (General Health, Physical Functioning, Emotional Well-being/Mental Health, Social Functioning, Role Limitation due to Physical Health, Role Limitation due to Emotional Health, Vitality [eg, energy], and Bodily Pain). High fatigue also was associated with self-reported chronic graft-versus-host disease, anxiety, depression and sleep problems. Diagnosis of plasma cell disorder and receipt of an autologous transplant were associated with high fatigue (P=.001). Among the 553 individuals who received an autologous transplant, 226 (41%) had multiple myeloma. Compared with the autologous transplant recipients without myeloma group, those with multiple myeloma were significantly more likely to have high fatigue (109 of 226 [48%] versus 118 of 325 [36%]; P < .01). Twenty percent of the patients with high fatigue did not discuss it with their care team. Among the 89 different reasons provided for not discussing it, the most common was "thought they already knew the answer" (n=21). The 370 survivors with high fatigue who identified at least 1 most effective PIMS generated a total of 639 PIMS. Although the PIMS for fatigue spanned a wide array of strategies, most PIMS were related to sleep/rest (n=192; 30%) or exercise (n=139; 22%). Although fatigue is associated with worse HCT survivor-reported outcomes, it is only sometimes discussed with care teams. Survivors identify specific strategies that are most effective. Given its prevalence and impact, clinicians should promote communication about fatigue, treat underlying causes, and recommend sleep/rest and exercise, recognizing that individualized approaches also may be beneficial.