Abstract
ABSTRACTService conditions experienced by rubber components often involve cyclic loads which are more complex than a constant amplitude loading history. Consequently, a model is needed for relating the results of constant amplitude characterization of fatigue behaviour to the effects of variable amplitude loading signals. The issue is explored here via fatigue crack growth experiments on pure shear specimens conducted in order to evaluate the applicability of a linear crack growth model equivalent to Miner's linear damage rule. This model equates the crack growth rate for a variable amplitude signal to the sum of the constant amplitude crack growth rates associated with each individual cycle. The variable amplitude signals were selected to show the effects of R‐ratio (ratio of minimum to maximum energy release rate), load level, load sequence, and dwell periods on crack growth rates. In order to distinguish the effects of strain crystallization on crack growth behaviour, two filled rubber compounds were included: one that strain crystallizes, natural rubber, and one that does not, styrene‐butadiene rubber. The linear crack growth model was found to be applicable in most cases, but a dwell effect was observed that is not accounted for by the model.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
