Abstract
Nowadays, many people take short breaks with their smartphone at work. The decision whether to continue working or to take a smartphone break is a so-called labour versus leisure decision. Motivational models predict that people are more likely to switch from labour (work) to leisure (smartphone) the more fatigue or boredom they experience. In turn, fatigue and boredom are expected to decrease after the smartphone was used. However, it is not yet clear how smartphone use at work relates to fatigue and boredom. In this study, we tested these relationships in both directions. Participants (n = 83, all PhD candidates) reported their current level of fatigue and boredom every hour at work while an application continuously logged their smartphone use. Results indicate that participants were more likely to interact with their smartphone the more fatigued or bored they were, but that they did not use it for longer when more fatigued or bored. Surprisingly, participants reported increased fatigue and boredom after having used the smartphone (more). While future research is necessary, our results (i) provide real-life evidence for the notion that fatigue and boredom are temporally associated with task disengagement, and (ii) suggest that taking a short break with the smartphone may have phenomenological costs.
Highlights
Nowadays, most people own a smartphone [1] and have it within reach throughout the day
The development of smartphone use over the working day is shown in figure 1b
We examined the bidirectional relationship between subjective experiences that are known markers for low motivation—i.e. fatigue and boredom—and smartphone use at work, which we quantified through objective logging data
Summary
Most people own a smartphone [1] and have it within reach throughout the day. People were mostly disconnected from their private life while at work; today, people can use their smartphone for private matters during working hours [2]. Even when they are at work, smartphones enable people to be constantly connected to friends and family through social media and instant messaging applications [3]. Against the background of this societal development, here we study the relationship between aversive subjective experiences that are indicative of low royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsos R.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.