Abstract

Nickel-Titanium alloys (Nitinol) are widely used for biomedical applications. Peripheral stents are almost exclusively composed of Nitinol, as its superelasticity is suited for minimally-invasive insertion and durable effect. After crimping and deployment stents undergo cyclic multi-axial loads imposed by vascular and lower-limb motion (e.g. axial compression, bending, and torsion). This complex mechanical environment could lead to metal fatigue and device fracture, with possible severe consequences (e.g. in-stent restenosis). Standard regulations require experimental verification of stent fatigue behaviour for preclinical assessment, but no exact indications are provided to direct the load combination. Moreover, different fatigue criteria were developed for common metals to predict fatigue endurance, but no criteria were specifically defined for the unique thermo-mechanical properties of Nitinol. This study investigated the role of cyclic multi-axial loading conditions on different stent geometries, looking at how they affect the stress/strain distribution along the device and how different criteria may affect the fatigue prediction (e.g. the standard Von Mises alternate approach and other critical plane approaches). Then, a preliminary experimental fatigue campaign was performed in agreement with the numerical simulations in order to compare the numerical predictions with the experimental results. The result suggest that the critical plane approaches are more reliable than the standard Von Mises criterion.

Highlights

  • Peripheral stents are almost exclusively composed of Nitinol, as its super-elasticity is suited for minimally invasive insertion and durable effect [1]

  • This study investigated the role of cyclic multi-axial loading conditions on different stent geometries, looking at how they affect the stress/strain distribution along the device and how different criteria may affect the fatigue prediction

  • The material fatigue strength obtained from experimental results was introduced in the constant life diagram of each criterion (Fig. 2a and 3a) and used to calculate a fatigue risk factor (RF), defined as the normalized distance between the point cloud and the fatigue strength (Table 1 and 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Peripheral stents are almost exclusively composed of Nitinol, as its super-elasticity is suited for minimally invasive insertion and durable effect [1]. Nitinol stents fatigue assessment is still an open issue and no univocal indications are available due to the peculiarity of the material and the complexity of the device geometry. The results of finite element analysis (FEA) must be interpreted through fatigue criteria to assess the risk of failure, yet no unequivocal indication for Nitinol device failure remains available. Originally formulated for standard metals, were used in this study to evaluate the fatigue behavior of a Nitinol stent undergoing multi-axial loads and validated experimentally

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call