Abstract

Pitting corrosion is a critical issue for steam turbine operators since localised surface degradation causes stress concentration which may lead to fatigue failure. Dual certified 403/410 martensitic 12% Cr steel – which is a standard material for steam turbine blades in the low pressure part – was tested using ultrasonic fatigue testing technique. Experiments were performed up to the very high cycle fatigue regime on both smooth and pre-pitted specimens. For the latter, corrosion pits of defined size comparable to those found in failed turbine blades were generated artificially. Test environments were air at 90 ◦C and aerated 6 ppm Cl− solution at 90 ◦C (for details see [1]). In this work, the results of extensive fatigue tests [1, 2] are evaluated using two different approaches. Fatigue assessment was performed using the √ area parameter model developed byMurakami and Endo [3] and the small-crack model by El Haddad et al. [4]. The prediction equation for the first model is expressed as w = a(Hv + 120) (√ area )1/6 · ( 1− R 2 ) (1)

Highlights

  • Pitting corrosion is a critical issue for steam turbine operators since localised surface degradation causes stress concentration which may lead to fatigue failure

  • For pre-pitted specimens in air, the prediction error is within ca. ±20% (for pit sizes of 50 m (+14% at R = 0.05 and −13% at R = 0.5), 100 m

  • No acceptable results were found for 6 ppm Cl− solution where the prediction error is as high as −53%

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pitting corrosion is a critical issue for steam turbine operators since localised surface degradation causes stress concentration which may lead to fatigue failure. Experiments were performed up to the very high cycle fatigue regime on both smooth and pre-pitted specimens. For the latter, corrosion pits of defined size comparable to those found in failed turbine blades were generated artificially. [3] and the small-crack model by El Haddad et al [4]. The prediction equation for the first model is expressed as w. Where 0 is the fatigue limit for smooth specimens, l is the crack/defect length and l0 is the fictitious crack length l0 = 1 ·.

Results and discussion
MATEC Web of Conferences
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.