Fate and toxicity of legacy and novel brominated flame retardants in a sediment-water-clam system: Bioaccumulation, elimination, biotransformation and structural damage

Abstract

Due to the characteristics of persistent organic pollutants (POPs), some legacy brominated flame retardants (LBFRs) were prohibited from use, and then gradually replaced by novel brominated flame retardants (NBFRs). However, till now little research focused on the effects of NBFRs on the benthos. In the present study, 0.5, 5, and 50 mg/kg dw of pentabromotoluene (PBT), hexabromobenzene (HBB), 1,2-bis(2,4,6-tribromophenoxy) ethane (BTBPE), decabromodiphenyl ethane (DBDPE) and decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE209) were added into sediments to test freshwater clams (Corbicula fluminea). In the 35-day exposure experiment, C. fluminea had different enrichment behaviors in three treatment groups. It was conjectured that in the lower dose group, the clams ingested contaminants and tended to be stable over time. While in higher dose groups, the clams were induced by the chemicals, leading to the changes in physiological activities so that the concentrations showed a downward trend first and then went up. The half-lives of contaminants in freshwater clams were between 0.911 and 11.6 days. DBDPE showed stronger bioaccumulation ability than BDE209 in this study. Parabolic relationships were observed between log BSAF and log Kow values in clam tissues. Debromination, hydroxylation, and methoxylated products were detected. Additionally, the gill samples of C. fluminea exposed to 50 mg/kg dw of single substance were observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM), indicating that the adhesions, tissue hyperplasia, and messy cilia occurred on the surface. Our research potentially contributes to further evaluations of the environmental risks posed in sediments contaminated by PBT, HBB, BTBPE, DBDPE, and BDE209, particularly the benthic organisms.