Fatal Arrhythmic Risks in Cardiac Sarcoidosis With Mildly Impaired Cardiac Function

Abstract

BackgroundThe prognosis and later fatal arrhythmia in cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) with relatively preserved cardiac function were unclear. ObjectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the prognosis and arrhythmic events in patients with CS and mildly impaired cardiac function. MethodsData were collected from a nationwide Japanese cohort survey conducted in 57 hospitals (n = 420); 322 patients with CS with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >35% were investigated. ResultsVentricular tachycardia (VT) manifestation was present in 50 patients (16%) and absent in 272 (84%), of whom 36 (72%) and 46 (17%), respectively, had an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Over a median of 5 years, 23 all-cause deaths and 31 appropriate ICD discharges were observed. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, all-cause death did not differ between patients with and without VT manifestation (P = 0.660), although appropriate ICD therapy was significantly less used in patients without VT manifestation than in those with VT manifestation (P < 0.001). Of the 272 patients without VT manifestation, 18 had ventricular arrhythmic events (VAEs), including 3 sudden cardiac deaths and 15 appropriate ICD discharges. In multivariate analysis, concomitant nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) with atrioventricular block (AVB), lower LVEF, abnormal gallium-67 scintigraphy or 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography of the heart (Ga/PET), and concomitant NSVT with abnormal Ga/PET at CS diagnosis were independent predictors of VAEs (P = 0.008, P = 0.021, P = 0.049, and P = 0.024, respectively). ConclusionsIf concomitant NSVT with AVB, concomitant NSVT with abnormal Ga/PET, or abnormal Ga/PET is observed in patients with CS and mildly impaired cardiac function (LVEF >35%), ICD should be considered as primary prevention.