Abstract

����� ��� In this essay, I argue that N. Scott Momaday’s House Made of Dawn responds to a modernist understanding of the nature of truth and its relation to the written word. Specifically, Momaday’s novel responds to Ernest Hemingway’s “The Snows of Kilimanjaro,” which suggests a separation, and at times even an antagonism, between the written word and what can be understood as truth. At the heart of both texts is the nature of the word and the narrative form necessary for that word to convey truth. For Hemingway, the word is a vehicle for expressing the truth excavated from the soil of the writer’s life or, alternatively, a mask to veil that Truth. Hemingway’s image of the “fighter” burning the fat from his body suggests an antagonism between the writer and language. Momaday, on the other hand, understands the word as truth, which a writer must transmit without creating interference, without making it “fat” in the words of his character Reverend Big Bluff Tosomah. Momaday emphasizes language’s ability to generate Truth rather than merely expressing it. Both writers acknowledge the potential for corrupting Truth with language, and by reading Hemingway and Momaday in conversation with each other—and with Julia Kristeva’s theories on language and abjection—we gain a perspective from which language does not merely express truth but generates and affirms it as well. Hemingway and Momaday both position written language as closely intertwined with life and death. In “The Snows of Kilimanjaro,” Hemingway’s hero, Harry, constantly associates writing with death, which speaks to Julia Kristeva’s claim that language, literary language in particular, skirts an “apocalypse” at the “fragile border . . . where identities (subject/object, etc.) do not exist or only barely so” (207). According to Kristeva, literature reveals the abject by forcing us to confront the linguistic barrier we place between ourselves and meaninglessness and “compels language to come nearest to the human enigma, to the place where it kills, thinks, and experiences [enjoyment] all at the same time” (206). Hemingway’s Harry lingers on the fragile border between life and death while he lies dying of gangrene from an infected wound in his leg. Harry thinks of all the moments he “had saved to write” (42), for which death is often the centerpiece. “He had never written a line,” for example, of the winter day “Barker had flown across the lines to bomb the Austrian officers’ leave train, machine-gunning them as they scattered and ran” (42). Nor had he

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call