Abstract

During migratory stopovers, birds must make decisions about when and where to travel and these decisions are likely contingent on their fuel stores, food availability, and antioxidant capacity as well as seasonal changes in key environmental factors. We conducted a field experiment on an offshore stopover site (Block Island, Rhode Island, United States: 41°130N, 71°330W) during autumn migration to test the hypothesis that birds with greater fuel stores and non-enzymatic antioxidant capacity have shorter stopovers than lean birds with low antioxidant capacity, and to determine the extent to which this depends on migration strategy. We used a 2 × 2 factorial field experiment (two levels each of available food and dietary polyphenols) with four species of songbirds kept in captivity for 3–5 days to produce experimental groups with different fuel stores and antioxidant capacity. We attached digital VHF transmitters to assess stopover duration and departure direction using automated telemetry. Non-enzymatic antioxidant capacity increased during refueling for Red-eyed Vireos (Vireo olivaceus) and Blackpoll Warblers (Setophaga striata) fedad libdiets, and forad libfed Hermit Thrushes (Catharus guttatus) supplemented with polyphenols, but not for Yellow-rumped Warblers (Setophaga coronata coronata). Glutathione peroxidase (GPx) decreased during captivity and was influenced by dietary treatment only in Red-eyed Vireos. Oxidative damage decreased during captivity for all species except Yellow-rumped Warblers. Stopover duration was shorter for Vireos and Blackpolls fedad libas compared to those fed maintenance.Ad libfed Hermit Thrushes supplemented with polyphenols had shorter stopovers than those fedad lib, as did thrushes fed at maintenance and supplemented with polyphenols compared with those fed at maintenance alone. There was no influence of condition on stopover duration for Yellow-rumped Warblers. Departure direction was not strongly related to condition, and birds primarily reoriented north when departing Block Island. Thus, fat stores and oxidative status interacted to influence the time passerines spent on stopover, and condition-dependent departure decisions were related to a bird’s migration strategy. Therefore, seasonal variation in macro- and micro-nutrient resources available for refueling at stopover sites can affect body condition and antioxidant capacity and in turn influence the timing and success of migration.

Highlights

  • Almost 19% of all extant bird species (∼1,855 species) undergo seasonal migrations, maximizing their fitness by taking advantage of spatially distinct habitats that vary in resources, environmental conditions, predation, parasites, or competition (Steadman, 2005; Somveille et al, 2013, 2015)

  • The evidence for a relationship among fuel stores, time on a stopover site, and/or direction of subsequent flights is generally derived from an observation of the body condition of an individual migratory bird at capture and the amount of time it spends at that stopover after release (Seewagen and Guglielmo, 2010; Eikenaar et al, 2016b; Schmaljohann and Eikenaar, 2017)

  • Change in body mass was influenced by treatment group for Hermit Thrushes and Yellow-rumped Warblers [Figure 2, F(3, 56) = 19.55, P < 0.001], post-hoc tests revealed that these changes were affected by food availability and not antioxidant treatment (Tukey HSD; Ad lib— Ad Lib + Dietary Antioxidants: p = 0.89, 95% CI = -0.53 to 1.43; Maintenance—Maintenance + Dietary Antioxidants: p = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.10–2.00)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Almost 19% of all extant bird species (∼1,855 species) undergo seasonal migrations, maximizing their fitness by taking advantage of spatially distinct habitats that vary in resources, environmental conditions, predation, parasites, or competition (Steadman, 2005; Somveille et al, 2013, 2015). Some avian species are capable of traveling thousands of kilometers during a migratory flight (Gill et al, 2009; DeLuca et al, 2019), most migratory journeys, especially among passerines, are characterized by shorter flights punctuated by longer rest and refueling periods on stopover (Pomeroy et al, 2006; Seewagen and Guglielmo, 2010; Chernetsov, 2012; Covino et al, 2015). These stop-and-go migration strategies include alternately building and expending energy and nutrients at stopover and during flight, respectively (Cohen et al, 2012; Guglielmo, 2018; Schmaljohann and Klinner, 2020). Given the diversity of passerine species that pass-through a specific stopover site during migration (Baird et al, 1959; Parrish, 1997; Smith and Paton, 2011), additional experiments are needed that examine the impact of fuel stores on stopover behavior across multiple species that differ in migration and feeding strategies

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call