Abstract

In the future, an increasing number of salmon farms may be located in areas with fast water current velocity due to limited availability of more sheltered locations. However, there is lit- tle information as to how fast currents affect fish health and welfare. We used raceways to expose Atlantic salmon post-smolts (98.6 g, 22.3 cm) to homogeneous water velocities corresponding to 0.2, 0.8 and 1.5 body lengths s �1 (slow, moderate and fast, respectively) over 6 wk. Fish at fast velocity had a 5% lower weight gain compared to fish at moderate and slow velocities, with a cor- responding reduction in length. Fish at moderate and fast velocities had lower lipid content in the muscle compared to fish at slow velocity. Hence, fish at slow and moderate velocities had the same weight gain, but fish at slow velocity gained more fat and fish at moderate velocity more muscle protein. Fish at fast velocity had a higher relative ventricular mass, indicating an increased cardiac workload. At slow velocity, individual fish displayed elevated plasma levels of lactate, osmolality and potassium. Our results suggest that post-smolts had the best growth and welfare at moderate velocity and that a current velocity of 1.5 body lengths s �1 could compromise production performance.

Highlights

  • Fish farms have been located in sheltered areas

  • Our results suggest that post-smolts had the best growth and welfare at moderate velocity and that a current velocity of 1.5 body lengths s−1 could compromise production performance

  • Fish kept at a water velocity of 1.5 body lengths (BL) s−1 had a lower production performance than fish kept at either 0.8 or 0.2 BL s−1

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Environmental aspects and conflicting interests regarding usage of coastal waters in populated areas have contributed to an increased number of farms being located in exposed areas (Stickney & McVey 2002, Benetti et al 2010, Holmer 2010). Areas with fast current velocity may improve water quality by increased water exchange in cages, and the technology for constructing cages capable of withstanding such external forces is well developed (Fredheim & Langan 2009). In areas with slow currents, fish have the option to vary their swimming speed. In exposed areas with faster currents, fish are forced to swim at the prevailing velocity to maintain their position (Johansson et al 2014). The swimming speeds measured in sea cages are rarely corrected for ambient current veloc-

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call