Abstract

We report here the first coupling of fast GC to IRMS, in a system capable of 250 ms peak widths (fwhm) at 1 mL/min flow rates, one-fifth as narrow as any previously reported GCC-IRMS system. We developed an optimized postcolumn interface that results in minimal peak broadening, using a programmable temperature vaporization injector in place of a rotary valve or backflush system to divert solvent, a narrow capillary combustion reactor followed by a cryogenic water trap with narrow-bore (<0.20 mm i.d.) transfer lines, and a narrow i.d. open split to the IRMS directly inserted into the column effluent. Quantitative combustion was demonstrated with CH4 injections. A comparison of CO2 injections with different fwhm peak widths (250, 2500, and 7500 ms) showed similar precisions, SD(delta13C)=0.2-0.3 per thousand, for injections of >600 pmol C on column; precision for the narrow peaks (250 ms) was considerably better for injections<150 pmol C on column. SD(delta13C)<1 per thousand was achievable for injections of 5-15 pmol on column for 250 ms wide peaks, 10-fold better precision than 2500 ms wide peaks, and within a factor of 3 of the counting statistics limit. For a mixture of 15 fatty acid methyl esters (FAME), 1.5 nmol C of each on column yielded typical SD(delta13Cpdb)=0.4 per thousand for fast GC and 0.5 per thousand for conventional GC. For 14 of the 15 FAME, delta13C values between the two systems were within+/-1.5 per thousand and not significantly different. Fast GCC-IRMS required one-third the run time (450 s vs 1400 s) to achieve comparable resolution. Mean peak widths for fast GCC-IRMS of the FAME were 720 ms, compared to 650 ms by fast GC with flame ionization detection. At a 15-fold dilution (100 pmol C on column for each FAME), fast GCC-IRMS achieved approximately 2-fold better precision and accuracy than similar injections on conventional GCC-IRMS. Finally, a mixture of 10 steroids (approximately 7 nmol C (100 ng) each on column) was analyzed with mean precision of SD(delta13C)=0.2 per thousand in 620 s by fast GCC-IRMS, while conventional GCC-IRMS required 1200 s and achieved poorer resolution. delta13C values for the two system were similar (Deltadelta13C<or=2 per thousand for all steroids), indicating that accuracy is not compromised. In summary, fast GCC-IRMS can achieve similar precision to conventional GC with considerable time savings for standard sample sizes (>1 nmol C) and achieves modest precision (approximately 1 per thousand) near the counting statistics limit on low level components.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.