Abstract

To analyze the impact of using a hand held fan to speed the air-drying process during immediate adequacy evaluation of Fine Needle Aspirations. The effect on turn around time and staining quality is evaluated.Two mirror image air-dried smears for each pass were prepared. One was subjected to a small hand-held fan with a fan diameter of 7 cm held an average distance of 3 to 5 cm from the slide. The other smear was left to dry without a fan. A total of 93 consecutive pairs were evaluated over a 2-month duration.The average time needed for air-drying using the fan was 73 seconds (range 10–300 seconds, standard error 6.986), while it was 200 seconds (range 15–645 seconds, standard error 17.799) for those without fan. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Smears were then evaluated for single cells, cell clusters and background material and no appreciable difference in stain quality was noted between the 2 groups.The use of a small hand-held fan for air-drying shortened the drying time for FNA adequacy by an average of 127 seconds (63% time reduction) for each pass. The quality of staining was comparable. Using a fan is highly recommended.

Highlights

  • TFhigeuFraen:1blade diameter of 7 cm The Fan: blade diameter of 7 cm. and the distance from the slides is 3–5 cm

  • For optimum nuclear detail, the Papanicolaou stain is superior and some institutions utilize the ultrafast method of this stain in addition to or as a replacement for the Diff Quik (DQ) stain [6]

  • The DQ stain requires air drying of smears, a step that consumes a variable amount of time and sometimes becomes the ratelimiting step of the procedure

Read more

Summary

Recommended Citation

This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@WayneState. It has been accepted for inclusion in Wayne State University Associated BioMed Central Scholarship by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@WayneState. This article is available at DigitalCommons@WayneState: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/biomedcentral/192

Open Access
Findings
To the editor
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call