Abstract
ABSTRACTThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of changing dimensions on the hardness (H), disintegration time (DT), and wetting time (WT) of fast-disintegrating epinephrine tablets for sublingual administration as potential first aid treatment for anaphylaxis. Tablet formulations I and II, containing 0% and 10% epinephrine bitartrate, respectively, and weighing 150 mg were prepared by direct compression. Formulations were compressed at a range of forces using an 8/32″ die with concave punches (CP); a 10/32″ and an 11/32″ die with CP and flat punches (FP). Tablet weight variation, content uniformity, thickness, H, DT, and WT were measured. The 8/32″, 10/32″, and 11/32″ dies resulted in tablet thickness of ranges 0.25–0.19″, 0.17–0.1″, and 0.16–0.08″, respectively. The DT and WT using the 8/32″ die were ≤10 and ≤30 sec, respectively, at H ≤5.4 ± 0.2 kg for formulation I, and H ≤5.4 ± 0.3 kg for formulation II. The DT and WT were ≤10 and ≤30 sec, respectively, using 10/32″ die/CP, 10/32″ die/FP, 11/32″ die/CP, and 11/32″ die/FP at H ≤6.2 ± 0.6 kg, ≤6.8 ± 0.4 kg, ≤4.9 ± 0.1 kg, and ≤7.2 ± 0.3 kg, respectively, for formulation I. For formulation II, the DT and WT were ≤10 sec and ≤30 sec, respectively, when H < 4 kg. No difference in DT and WT was observed between concave and flat tablets. The 11/32″ and 10/32″ dies resulted in more ideal tablet dimensions for sublingual administration, but H must be maintained <4 kg to ensure rapid DT and WT.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.