Abstract

The deviance information criterion (DIC) has been widely used for Bayesian model comparison. However, recent studies have cautioned against the use of certain variants of the DIC for comparing latent variable models. For example, it has been argued that the conditional DIC–based on the conditional likelihood obtained by conditioning on the latent variables–is sensitive to transformations of latent variables and distributions. Further, in a Monte Carlo study that compares various Poisson models, the conditional DIC almost always prefers an incorrect model. In contrast, the observed-data DIC–calculated using the observed-data likelihood obtained by integrating out the latent variables–seems to perform well. It is also the case that the conditional DIC based on the maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimate might not even exist, whereas the observed-data DIC does not suffer from this problem. In view of these considerations, fast algorithms for computing the observed-data DIC for a variety of high-dimensional latent variable models are developed. Through three empirical applications it is demonstrated that the observed-data DICs have much smaller numerical standard errors compared to the conditional DICs. The corresponding Matlab code is available upon request.

Highlights

  • Hypothesis testing, and more generally model comparison, has long been an important problem in statistics and econometrics

  • Economic theory rarely dictates a functional form for the regression relationship between the dependent variable and the regressors, while a fully nonparametric regression suffers from the curse of dimensionality

  • A similar dataset is fitted using a variety of factor models in Nardari and Scruggs (2007) and they find 3-factor models fit the data best using the Bayes factor as the model comparison criterion

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hypothesis testing, and more generally model comparison, has long been an important problem in statistics and econometrics. We provide analytical expressions for the integrated likelihoods under three popular families of latent variable models: factor models, linear Gaussian state space models and semiparametric models To evaluate these integrated likelihoods, we draw on recent advances in sparse matrix algorithms, and the computational details are carefully discussed. The DICs based on the integrated likelihoods are more accurately estimated This result is intuitive since integrating out the high-dimensional latent variables is expected to reduce the variance in Monte Carlo simulation. Our results provide another practical reason for why DICs based on conditional and complete-data likelihoods should not be used.

Deviance Information Criterion
Fast Computation of the Observed-Data DIC
Factor Model
Linear Gaussian State Space Model
Semiparametric Regression
Empirical Applications
Factor Models for Stock Portfolio Returns
Priors and Results
Vector Autoregressions for the US Economy
Time-Invariant and TVP-VARs
Concluding Remarks and Future Research
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call