Abstract

Whenever the relationship between religion and politics is being questioned in postwar Japan, the Christian group that called itself “Non-church movement” (henceforth Mukyokai) is almost always mentioned as an example of resistance against wartime “Japanese Fascism.” In sharp contrast with Japanese Christendom, which is said to actively mobilize itself in favor of Japanese fascism, the Mukyokai is rather appraised as a source of resistance to fascist ideas. In particular, Yanaihara Tadao, who is also a well-known colonial policy scholar, is hailed to be “one of the few monuments of resistance against ultra-nationalism.” Yet, why is it that in postwar Japan Mukyokai came to be understood almost entirely as a resistance movement to fascism? This paper is an attempt to probe into that question. First, by re-examining the place of Christianity in the history of postwar Japanese thought, I illustrate a pattern by which Christianity was almost always systematically excluded from the focus of academic analysis. Further, by examining the specific rhetoric that Yanaihara engaged in, I argue also that although he indeed criticized fascism based on his “pure belief, ” at the same time he also endorsed the concept of “sweeping fascism.” Finally, through questioning the discourse of Mukyokai, I also point out the limitations of the discourse of “Japanese Fascism, ” which failed in its treatise of Mukyokai by positing it within the ordinary framework of “fascism versus democracy.”

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.