Abstract

The therapeutic approach to chronic aspecific low back pain (CALBP) has to consider the multifactorial aetiology of the disorder. International guidelines do not agree on unequivocal treatment indications. Recommendations for fascial therapy are few and of low level evidence but several studies indicate strong correlations between fascial thickness and low back pain. This study aims at comparing the effectiveness of Fascial Manipulation® associated with a physiotherapy program following guidelines for CALBP compared to a physiotherapy program alone. 24 subjects were randomized into two groups, both received eight treatments over 4 weeks. Outcomes were measured at baseline, at the end of therapy and at a 1 month and a 3 months follow-up. Pain was measured with the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the brief pain inventory (BPI), function with the Rolland-Morris disability questionnaire (RMDQ), state of well-being with the short-form 36 health-survey (SF-36). The mean clinical important difference (MCID) was also measured. Patients receiving Fascial Manipulation® showed statistically and clinically significant improvements at the end of care for all outcomes, in the short (RMDQ, VAS, BPI) and medium term for VAS and BPI compared to manual therapy. The MCID show significant improvements in the means and percentage of subjects in groups in all outcomes post-treatment, in the short and medium term. Fascial tissues were implicated in the aetiology of CALBP and treatment led to decreased symptomatic, improved functional and perceived well-being outcomes that were of greater amplitude compared to manual therapy alone.

Highlights

  • Chronic aspecific chronic low back pain (CALBP) is defined as pain and/or discomfort localised below the costal margin and above the gluteal folds with possible posterior thigh irradiations not extending below the knee; symptoms have to be present for over 3 months or longer than the expected normal healing time[1]

  • Thirty-two patients were recruited from April to December 2009, 24 completed the trial, 6 participants were not enrolled for organizational reasons, 2 withdrew for reasons not directly related to treatment

  • After randomization the study group (SG) was composed of 11 patients (4 males, 7 females), the control group (CG) was composed of 13 patients (4 males, 9 females)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Chronic aspecific chronic low back pain (CALBP) is defined as pain and/or discomfort localised below the costal margin and above the gluteal folds with possible posterior thigh irradiations not extending below the knee; symptoms have to be present for over 3 months or longer than the expected normal healing time[1]. Recent studies have demonstrated an association between thickness and disorganization of the connective tissue (fascia) and CALBP9–11 but no guidelines could be found regarding the recommendations of a therapeutic approach focused on fascial tissues. For these reasons, it was decided to conduct an experimental study comparing the effectiveness of Fascial Manipulation® (FM) versus the physiotherapeutic recommendations provided by guidelines (standard manual therapy) (MT). Results: Patients receiving Fascial Manipulation® showed statistically and clinically significant improvements at the end of care for all outcomes, in the short (RMDQ, VAS, BPI) and medium term for VAS and BPI compared to manual therapy. Conclusion: Fascial tissues were implicated in the aetiology of CALBP and treatment led to decreased symptomatic, improved functional and perceived well-being outcomes that were of greater amplitude compared to manual therapy alone

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.