Abstract
This paper is the first to study the effect of enhanced derivative and hedging footnote disclosures on information asymmetries in bank loan contracting. Utilizing the issuance of SFAS 161, we employ a difference-in-differences design to evaluate 3,732 bank loans for 1,126 firms in the United States between 2002 and 2017. We find that borrowers whose disclosures change more after SFAS 161 enjoy lower loan spreads and fewer general covenants and have more but less stringent financial covenants. Further analyses indicate that the increased qualitative and quantitative disclosures and use of tabular display after SFAS 161 matter most for lenders in loan contracting. Our empirical results also show that the changes in contract terms are driven by the abatement of information uncertainty regarding the firm value and the improvement in firm’s disclosure quality after SFAS 161, which helps explain how enhanced DH disclosures affect information asymmetries in bank loan contracting.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
