Abstract

In this article, we operationalized a sustainability framing based on the Sustainable Rural Livelihood Resources Framework (SLF), which consists of five capitals—human, physical, social, financial, and natural. We proposed a sustainability index (SI) for two landscapes dominated by two agricultural systems: cattle ranching and small-scale family agriculture. Farm variables within each capital were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis. Key variables were identified and index values were calculated for each capital. These were combined through a set of simultaneous equations to estimate farm-specific capitals and SI from the observed farm variables. Principal component and cluster analyses were used to group the farms according to their index scores and to further compare their characteristics. Furthermore, with the purpose of comparing the index scoring with an independent metric, a landscape indicator, which comes from a continuous forest, was calculated. From the results, the capitals that contributed to a higher SI score the most were financial and physical. As cattle ranching was associated with higher economic returns and infrastructure investments, this livelihood was identified as the most sustainable. Yet, cattle ranching has been a deforestation driver in the region. These results are attributed to the current conceptual framework design, which gives greater weight to material and economic variables; therefore, it generates a weak sustainability measure. Although the framework allowed us to identify land-use alternatives that could improve SI scores (i.e., silvopastoral systems), corrections to the proposed framework and methodological approach will need to include additional environmental benefits currently unaccounted for. Farmers that use their farms for conservation purposes should be recognized and compensated. An improved environmentally focused SI operational framework could help to endorse and promote sustainable livelihoods and to generate a strong sustainability measure.

Highlights

  • Sustainability is a wide and multidimensional concept that should be measured using variables selected for their conceptual meaning to provide relevant and reliable indicators [1]

  • Despite the documented strengths of this conceptual framework, we evaluated its weaknesses in its application to the particular case of the Colombian Amazon

  • According to the Colombian census carried out in 2014 [21], the sample is representative of the 22% of the farmers who are mainly dedicated to cattle ranching in the foothills and of the 15% who practice small-scale agriculture in the mountains

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sustainability is a wide and multidimensional concept that should be measured using variables selected for their conceptual meaning to provide relevant and reliable indicators [1]. Metrics, and indices have been proposed for assessing the sustainability of smallholder farms [2]. Their application under different socioeconomic and geographic contexts does not guarantee generating reliable results [1]. The expansion of the agricultural frontier, especially for cattle ranching, is the primary cause of deforestation and forest degradation in Colombia [3]. 47% of forest loss in the Colombian Amazon is concentrated in Caquetá, which is at the Amazon frontier and where agriculture and cattle ranching increased by almost 40% from 1999 to 2017 [4].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call