Abstract

AbstractThis chapter summarizes the sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from different economic sectors in Nigeria and emphasizes those arising from agriculture and forestry. The impacts of climate change on agricultural systems in Nigeria are likely to be large, motivating the need for additional knowledge to assess current practices and formulate appropriate modifications for both mitigation and adaptation. Some current farming practices are believed to be adaptive, but further study would provide better assessments. We also analyzed the trade-offs between household income and GHG emissions at two contrasting sites in northern Nigeria. A farm optimization model maximizing the value of crop, livestock, and tree production activities in a single representative year assessed the potential impacts for GHG reductions of 10% and 25% and the maximum allowable reductions of 26% and 30% on farm activities and income. Emissions reductions of 10% reduced annual household incomes by less than 5% but required substantive changes, especially in livestock owned. Maximum possible GHG emissions reductions (while still meeting minimum household consumption needs) would require marked changes in production pattern and would lower household incomes by 22–44%. We did not assess effects over longer periods, where the role of livestock as a key asset may imply additional negative impacts. Productivity-enhancing technologies that would simultaneously reduce GHG emissions and increase incomes are needed for smallholder farms to play a larger role in climate change mitigation without the burden of reduced incomes and greater risk. This suggests the need for programmatic and policy actions both by national agricultural research systems and the Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research (CGIAR).

Highlights

  • Agriculture is the major employer of labor in Nigeria (Hansen et al 2017) for over 70% of the estimated 200 million inhabitants (United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs: Population Division 2020)

  • To assess the potential impacts on agricultural production patterns and full household income scenarios evaluated a baseline and required greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions of 10%, 25%, and the maximum reductions consistent with meeting assumed household consumption needs (26% and 30% reductions compared to the baseline)

  • Of all the trees allowed to remain on the farm, none met the criteria for the study (i.e., dry season feed, enriching soil nitrogen, increasing protein and energy content in fodder while mitigating GHG emissions like Locust-beans (Parkia biglobosa), Camel’s foot/Kalgo (Piliostigma reticulatum) and are distinctively the most popular leguminous tree owned by 10% in Bunkure local government areas (LGAs) and 24% of farmers in Maigateri LGA

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Of all the trees allowed to remain on the farm, none met the criteria for the study (i.e., dry season feed, enriching soil nitrogen, increasing protein and energy content in fodder while mitigating GHG emissions like Locust-beans (Parkia biglobosa), Camel’s foot/Kalgo (Piliostigma reticulatum) and are distinctively the most popular leguminous tree owned by 10% in Bunkure LGA and 24% of farmers in Maigateri LGA. Despite the numerous benefits of soybean and groundnut residue biomass for nitrogen fixation and GHG mitigation when used for soil amendments as an adaptation strategy, majority of farmers in Bunkure and Maigateri LGA sold their crop residue biomass The implication of these practices are consequential as it may lead to more emissions of CH4, CO2, and N2O, which may result in accelerated nutrient depletion from burning of bushes and crop residues, leaching, and acid rains (NH3 of volatilization) from the application of inorganic fertilizer (IPCC 2013). More accurate indices and numbers could be achieved with the use of system dynamic model analyses (Sterman 1989; Kopainsky and Nicholson 2015), and could be considered as suggestion for further studies

Conclusions
Findings
31 À385 11
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call