Abstract

Farmer perspectives are relevant for understanding agricultural issues and formulating policies. In this study, we conducted a cross-sectional survey on 70 Filipino farmers (i.e., 35 organic and 35 biotech) to understand farmers’ perspectives regarding coexisting farming methods. Internal response variables were tested to verify the type of decision-making processes being undertaken by biotech and organic farmers. Our results showed that a non-linear decision-making process, similar to the Stimulus–Organism–Response Model, was present for both farmer groups. The study also found that biotech farmers were more influenced by internal factors (e.g., consumer resources) than organic farmers, who rely more on external influences (e.g., culture and social interactions), in connection to their coexistence perspective. The presence of “maverick executives” within the organic farmers gives traction to the notion that coexistence can help empower farmers in choosing what farming method is most suitable to their needs. Our data can also provide insights to policymakers in terms of surveying farmer perspectives to balance farmer needs, primarily in yield and income security, with the national agricultural agenda centered on environmental conservation. Thus, farmer perspectives should be considered alongside ongoing studies and debates on coexistence.

Highlights

  • The United Nations (UN) predicts that the global population will continue to increase to 9.7 billion by 2050 from 7.7 billion in 2019, which will pose many threats to sustainable development [1]

  • A difference could be seen in terms of the familiarity and knowledge of biotech and organic crops, where biotech farmers answered with higher familiarity

  • For the biotech farmer group, only the level of benefit derived from current farming method and likelihood to buy seeds based on current farming method were found to have a significant relationship (Figure 3b)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The United Nations (UN) predicts that the global population will continue to increase to 9.7 billion by 2050 from 7.7 billion in 2019, which will pose many threats to sustainable development [1]. The coexistence of different production systems—such as organic, conventional, and genetically engineered (GE) or biotech crops—has been identified as a workable solution to support the agricultural sector in meeting the world’s food demands and addressing climate change challenges [4,5,6,7]. In the Philippines, different production systems, organic farming and biotech farming, are viewed as separate systems and have been perceived as dichotomizing issues for many years Both technologies are highly supported in various regions of the country. The Philippines currently ranks 12th worldwide in the list of biotech megacountries, with 0.9 million ha of biotech corn [8] It was the first country in Southeast

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call