Abstract

Abstract Punk’s embrace of autonomous, do-it-yourself artistic production has been widely documented as a key element of the punk ‘explosion’. At times, however, the rhetoric has exceeded the actual practice and the boundary between DIY authorship and professional production has become blurred. Although much early punk visual material was indeed raw, rough and ready, and often appeared to run counter to any kind of formal aesthetic criteria in respect to design or taste, it was also widely the product of trained graphic designers and illustrators with a keen awareness of the appropriate visual language required to reflect a new, self-styled, anarchic and polemical subculture. Even many of the celebrated ‘do-it-yourself’ punk pioneers relied on access to professional services for reproduction, including printers, prepress art workers and specialist record sleeve manufacturers. However, much like the punks who chose to make their own outfits, rather than buy ‘official’ clothing from the burgeoning punk boutique (and mail order) market, some fans and enthusiasts attempted to create their own punk graphics or decided to adopt a naïve model of détournement to adapt or personalize jackets, shirts, school bags, scrapbooks and even record sleeves within their own collections. These home-made artefacts can be viewed as products of subcultural participation and belonging, as an individual’s response to punk’s call to arms and as markers of possession. They may also help us to better understand an underlying, distilled and unmediated interpretation of punk’s ‘natural’ visual language.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call