Abstract

The article analyses the Advocate General’s opinion and the Court of Justice’s judgment in the cases of Noorzia and Dogan, which concern the interpretation of the minimum age requirement for spouses in an application for family reunification and the integration measures that may be imposed on family members of third-country nationals in the same procedure. Specific attention is being paid to the issue of the individual assessment of an application for family reunification, especially as regards the two provisions at hand. The article argues that the Advocate General’s approach is reasonable and well-argued whereas the Court adopts a strict, unconvincing and inconsistent with its prior case law judgment.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.