Abstract

BackgroundLack of data in marginalized populations on knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) hampers efforts to improve modern contraceptive practice. A mixed methods study to better understand family planning KAP amongst refugee and migrant women on the Thailand-Myanmar border was conducted as part of an ongoing effort to improve reproductive health, particularly maternal mortality, through Shoklo Malaria Research Unit (SMRU) antenatal and birthing services.MethodsCross-sectional surveys and focus group discussions (FGDs) in currently pregnant women; and in-depth interviews (IDIs) in selected post-partum women with three children or more; were conducted. Quantitative data were described with medians and proportions and compared using standard statistical tests. Risk factors associated with high parity (>3) were identified using logistic regression analysis. Qualitative data were coded and grouped and discussed using identified themes.ResultsIn January-March 2015, 978 women participated in cross-sectional studies, 120 in FGD and 21 in IDI. Major positive findings were: > 90 % of women knew about contraceptives for birth spacing, >60 % of women in the FGD and IDI reported use of family planning (FP) in the past and nearly all women knew where they could obtain FP supplies. Major gaps identified included: low uptake of long acting contraception (LAC), lack of awareness of emergency contraception (>90 % of women), unreliable estimates of when child bearing years end, and misconceptions surrounding female sterilization. Three was identified as the ideal number of children in the cross-sectional survey but less than half of the women with this parity or higher in the IDI actually adopted LAC leaving them at risk for unintended pregnancy. Discussing basic female anatomy using a simple diagram was well received in FGD and IDIs. LAC uptake has increased particularly the IUD from 2013–2015.ConclusionDefinitive contextual issues were identified during this study and a significant range of action points have been implemented in FP services at SMRU as a result, particularly in regard to the IUD. The importance of the role and attitudes of husbands were acknowledged by women and studies to investigate male perspectives in future may enhance FP practice in this area.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12978-016-0212-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Lack of data in marginalized populations on knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) hampers efforts to improve modern contraceptive practice

  • More than 90 % of women knew about contraceptives for birth spacing, and more than 50 % knew sterilization could end child bearing and believed it was acceptable for nulliparous women to use contraceptives, women knew where they could obtain Family planning (FP) supplies and more than 60 % of women in Focus group discussion (FGD) and In-depth interviews (IDI) reported use of FP in the past

  • There is an inherent risk of bias in any study and this we aimed to minimize by exploring KAP via different methodologies

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Lack of data in marginalized populations on knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) hampers efforts to improve modern contraceptive practice. A mixed methods study to better understand family planning KAP amongst refugee and migrant women on the Thailand-Myanmar border was conducted as part of an ongoing effort to improve reproductive health, maternal mortality, through Shoklo Malaria Research Unit (SMRU) antenatal and birthing services. Planning (FP) is an essential component of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3 and addressed in SDG 3.7: “By 2030, ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health-care services, including for family planning, information and education, and the integration of reproductive health into national strategies and programs” [1] Marginalized populations such as refugees and migrants, often unreached by “national strategies and programs”, face unique barriers to information and access that would allow them to plan and space the number of children they desire. A problem recognized in migrant Burmese women in urban centres such as Mae Sot [8] and more recently for rural refugees and migrants who travel to Mae Sot [9]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call