Abstract

BackgroundThe predictD intervention, a multicomponent intervention delivered by family physicians (FPs), reduced the incidence of major depression by 21% versus the control group and was cost-effective. A qualitative methodology was proposed to identify the mechanisms of action of these complex interventions.PurposeTo seek the opinions of these FPs on the potential successful components of the predictD intervention for the primary prevention of depression in primary care and to identify areas for improvement.MethodQualitative study with FPs who delivered the predictD intervention at 35 urban primary care centres in seven Spanish cities. Face-to-face semi-structured interviews adopting a phenomenological approach. The data was triangulated by three investigators using thematic analysis and respondent validation was carried out.ResultsSixty-seven FPs were interviewed and they indicated strategies used to perform the predictD intervention, including specific communication skills such as empathy and the activation of patient resources. They perceived barriers such as lack of time and facilitators such as prior acquaintance with patients. FPs recognized the positive consequences of the intervention for FPs, patients and the doctor-patient relationship. They also identified strategies for future versions and implementations of the predictD intervention.ConclusionsThe FPs who carried out the predictD intervention identified factors potentially associated with successful prevention using this program and others that could be improved. Their opinions about the predictD intervention will enable development of a more effective and acceptable version and its implementation in different primary health care settings.

Highlights

  • Interventions to prevent depression are effective but their effect sizes are small to moderate [1,2]

  • The family physicians (FPs) who carried out the predictD intervention identified factors potentially associated with successful prevention using this program and others that could be improved

  • Several randomized controlled trials of primary prevention of depression in primary care have been undertaken [3], in only two the intervention was implemented by family physicians (FPs)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Interventions to prevent depression are effective but their effect sizes are small to moderate [1,2]. This intervention was tailored to each patient based on his/her risk profile for depression (risk factors present) and his/her risk level (likelihood of becoming depressed at 12 months), and it was developed as five a priori active components [5,6,7]: a training workshop for FPs; communicating the level and profile of risk of depression to patients every six months in a 10- to 15-minute interview; constructing a personalized bio-psycho-social intervention to prevent depression; offering a brochure; and activating and empowering patients This intervention reduced the incidence of major depression at 18 months follow-up by 21% versus the control group (usual care) [7] and it was costeffective [8]. To seek the opinions of these FPs on the potential successful components of the predictD intervention for the primary prevention of depression in primary care and to identify areas for improvement

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call