Abstract
Family language policy (FLP) has been establishing itself as a field in the past decade. Yet, much of the scholarly debate around family multilingualism has remained within the boundaries imposed by Western-centric epistemologies. In order to address this issue, this article reviews FLP studies published between 2008 and 2017, and discusses accomplishments and limitations of recent publications. The main argument presented here is that a critical approach to family multilingualism might contribute to the development of FLP in an unexplored direction. More specifically, this paper shows how drawing on a decolonial approach allows for an express engagement with debates that have only been marginally tapped into in current FLP scholarship, for instance, the intersectional dimension of social categorisations such as social class, race, and gender. Furthermore, a decolonial approach provides a robust frame to examine transnational practices by reconciling perspectives that tend to privilege either the material basis of the economic relations of production, or the cultural domain as a locus where these relations gain meaning. Finally, a decolonial approach to family multilingualism takes a step towards redressing the extant underrepresentation of southern theories in sociolinguistics.
Highlights
By Rafael Lomeu GomesLanguage policy (FLP) has been establishing itself as a field in the past decade
This article sets out to examine the development of Family Language Policy (FLP) as a field of study in the past ten years
While recent studies on family multilingualism have pushed the field of family language policy (FLP) in interesting and innovative directions, it is noteworthy that the theoretical frameworks with which researchers have worked remain within what could be understood as Westerncentric, canonic epistemologies
Summary
Language policy (FLP) has been establishing itself as a field in the past decade. Much of the scholarly debate around family multilingualism has remained within the boundaries imposed by Western-centric epistemologies. The main argument presented here is that a critical approach to family multilingualism might contribute to the development of FLP in an unexplored direction. This paper shows how drawing on a decolonial approach allows for an express engagement with debates that have only been marginally tapped into in current FLP scholarship, for instance, the intersectional dimension of social categorisations such as social class, race, and gender. A decolonial approach to family multilingualism takes a step towards redressing the extant underrepresentation of southern theories in sociolinguistics
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Multilingual Margins: A journal of multilingualism from the periphery
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.