Abstract
The aim was to evaluate the impact of family history of diabetes on the phenotype of patients diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes and the frequency of susceptibility genotypes. Patients with Type 2 diabetes with family history for both Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes (FH(MIX, n) = 196) or Type 2 diabetes only (FH(T2), n = 139) matched for age, sex, BMI and age at diagnosis, underwent an oral glucose tolerance test and a combined glucagon test and insulin tolerance test. Glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) antibodies and major Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes susceptibility gene variants were analysed. Patients were stratified into groups according to family history or GAD antibody positivity (GADA+, GADA-) or a combination of these (GADA+/FH(MIX), GADA+/FH(T2), GADA-/FH(MIX), GADA-/FH(T2)). Compared with other patients, those with FH(MIX) more often had GAD antibodies (14.3 vs. 4.3%, P = 0.003), and those with both FH(MIX) and GAD antibodies had the highest frequency of insulin deficiency (stimulated serum C-peptide < 0.7 nmol/l, GADA+/FH(MIX) 46.4% vs. GADA-/FH(MIX) 9.5% (P < 0.00001), GADA-/FH(T2) 4.5% (P < 0.00001), GADA+/FH(T2) 0%). Patients with GADA+/FH(MIX) more often had HLA-DQB1 risk genotypes compared with patients with GADA-/FH(MIX) or GADA-/FH(T2D) (47 vs. 23 or 14%, P = 0.05 and P < 0.00001, respectively). In logistic regression analyses, FH(MIX), GAD antibody positivity and HLA risk genotypes were independently associated with insulin deficiency. A family history for both type 1 and type 2 diabetes was associated with higher prevalence of GAD antibodies and HLA-DQB1 risk genotypes than a family history of type 2 diabetes only, and was associated with earlier and more severe development of insulin deficiency, which was only partially explained by GAD antibodies and HLA.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.