Abstract
To the Editor. — Hackler and Hiller's1recent article addressing the need to reconsider resuscitation policies was valuable in furthering the exchange of ideas on the of treatment. In the same issue, Tomlinson and Brody2also argue for the limiting of resuscitative efforts in the face of futility. However, the two points of view diverge at the important point of informing the patient or the incompetent patient's family that medical therapies would be clearly fruitless. Tomlinson and Brody, as well as Youngner3in a commentary on both articles, encourage discussion on the futility of therapy with the patient and family for a variety of reasons, such as facing denial of death. In contrast, Hackler and Hiller's first proposal states that hospital policy should allow physicians to write DNR orders without family [or patient] consent or discussion, if CPR would be futile.1 However, even when treatment
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
