Abstract

ObjectivePositron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging for head and neck cancers (HNC) is commonly utilized for post-treatment assessment. Though PET/CT in this setting has been reported to have high negative predictive values (> 90%), positive predictive values have been reported at approximately 50%, leading to high rates of false positivity (FP) and troubling management decisions for both patient and practitioner. The objective of this study was to identify patient, disease, treatment and imaging factors that might be associated with a higher likelihood of FP on initial post-treatment PET/CT imaging for patients treated for HNC. Materials and methodsA retrospective chart review was performed on 84 patients treated for HNC who received radiation therapy (RT) as part of their overall management from October 2005 to August 2013. Of the patients screened, 19 were found to have mucosally based squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with positive initial post-treatment PET/CT studies (23%). Fisher’s exact test was used to analyze the association between categorical variables and FP, including patient's gender, disease laterality, primary tumor site and stage, nodal and overall stage, high dose RT fraction size, number of RT fractions completed, total RT dose, biologically effective dose and timing of PET/CT acquisition. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to analyze the association between continuous variables and FP, including patient age, total elapsed days of RT, an amount of infused fluorodeoxyglucose 18F-FDG, pre-PET/CT serum glucose levels, and maximum standardized uptake value SUVmax. Statistically significant findings were those that were deemed p <0.05.ResultsAmong patients with positive initial post-treatment PET/CT scans for treated HNC, there was a lower proportion of higher primary disease stage associated with FP versus true positivity (T-stage 3-4: 20 vs 78%, respectively, p=0.023). We also discovered that 50% of patients that underwent confirmation for FP findings suffered serious complications as a direct consequence of invasive exploratory procedures.ConclusionsAlthough PET/CT is known for its exceptional negative predictive value (> 90%) in the post-treatment setting for HNC, high rates of FP remains a clinical challenge. Our study suggests that tumor stage (T-stage) may impact FP rates in positive initial post-treatment PET/CT scans. We recommend careful multidisciplinary discussion regarding positive PET/CT studies in the post-treatment setting for HNC, particularly if invasive intervention is considered.

Highlights

  • It is estimated that over 48,000 new cases of head and neck cancer (HNC) were diagnosed in the United States (US) in 2016 [1]

  • Among patients with positive initial post-treatment Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scans for treated HNC, there was a lower proportion of higher primary disease stage associated with false positivity (FP) versus true positivity (Tstage 3-4: 20 vs 78%, respectively, p=0.023)

  • PET/CT is known for its exceptional negative predictive value (> 90%) in the posttreatment setting for HNC, high rates of FP remains a clinical challenge

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is estimated that over 48,000 new cases of head and neck cancer (HNC) were diagnosed in the United States (US) in 2016 [1]. Patients with HNC commonly present with locally advanced disease, requiring a multidisciplinary approach for optimal outcomes, with radiation therapy (RT) delivered either in the post-operative [2] or definitive setting [3]. Options for the persistent or recurrent disease are limited and associated with low success rates [5], early detection of LRF has been shown to improve the ability for salvage [6]. Imaging is often acquired during the post-treatment assessment period and findings suggestive of LRF can be very clear and corroborated with gross disease found on physical and/or endoscopic examination. Deciding upon invasive confirmatory procedures for positive findings, in these more ambiguous scenarios should be done with caution, as invasive procedures within irradiated fields are known to be associated with morbidities [7,8]

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call