Abstract
Previous articleNext article No AccessFalse Issues in the Interest-Theory ControversyE. S. ShawE. S. Shaw Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Journal of Political Economy Volume 46, Number 6Dec., 1938 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/255318 Views: 2Total views on this site Citations: 6Citations are reported from Crossref PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Pascal Bridel The part played by general equilibrium in the liquidity preference vs loanable funds episode (1936–1956), The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 28, no.55 (Mar 2021): 753–786.https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2021.1893778Giovanni Cesaroni The finance motive, the Keynesian theory of the rate of interest and the investment multiplier, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 8, no.11 (Jan 2011): 58–74.https://doi.org/10.1080/713765224S.C. Tsiang Keynes' “Finance” Demand for Liquidity, Robertson's Loanable Funds Theory, and Friedman's Monetarism**This paper is a revised version of a talk given to a seminar at Nuffield College, Oxford, and again to a seminar at York University, England. I am indebted to Sir John Hicks, Fritz Machlup, Paul Samuelson, Maurice Scott, and Michael Sullivan for reading the manuscript and for valuable suggestions for improvement., (Jan 1989): 303–330.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-701721-1.50017-XPeter G. McGregor Keynes on Ex-ante Saving and the Rate of Interest, History of Political Economy 20, no.11 (Mar 1988): 107–118.https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-20-1-107Don Patinkin New Materials on the Development of Keynes’ Monetary Thought, History of Political Economy 12, no.11 (Mar 1980): 1–28.https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-12-1-1John R. Presley Loanable Funds Versus Liquidity Preference — The Hicks-Hansen Framework, (Jan 1978): 186–215.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03239-6_18
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
