Abstract

Recent discussion in philosophy of religion has moved on beyond the stage which is reflected in Chapters 2 and 3 of this book. It is accepted that the empiricists have made their point, but it is also accepted that that is not the end of the matter. If theology fails so catastrophically to be empirically grounded factual knowledge, can we be sure that that is what it is trying to be? Can we be sure that it is not succeeding in being something else instead? But then what is it that theology tries to be, and perhaps succeeds in being?

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.